Main
back: Atsar replacement -3 next: References -2
|
I do not want to impose any conclusions. I showed some ways to reach
my goal. The solution of the XS library was quite a lot of work in this
particular case, but usually much easier. Both other solution were
really simple. The programs are much shorter and simpler than in the original
atsar , including the extra of a graphical display.
I support the arguments of Linus Torvalds in favour of communication in text
from /proc to the programs in stead of the traditional
communication in binary structures: alignment and byte-ordering
differences between systems makes life much harder than needed. Textual
communication requires string-parsing which is simple in most languages
but C, and has little overhead as long as the language supports
associative arrays (hashes).
Links:
- Tutorial web site
- http://mark.overmeer.net/yapc2001/
markov@ATComputing.nl
- Tutorial software
- http://ppresenter.org
ask@ppresenter.org
- Atsar software
- ftp://ftp.ATComputing.nl/pub/tools/linux/
- SWIG
- http://swig.sourceforge.net
|